Probably many people are interested in the question of what is better to choose, Kia Rio or Ravon? In this article we will discuss technical characteristics of Ravon R 4, as well as Kia Rio, at the end we will make a comparison, as a result of which everyone will be able to independently determine for themselves which is better: Kia Rio or Ravon R4.

Kia Rio or Ravon R4: consider Ravon.

  • Design. Technical characteristics of Ravon R4 will be a little later. Now let's discuss the design. It is worth noting that the dimensions of the car are noted as the best in its class.
  • Design. Talking about technical specifications Ravon R4, it is worth noting the design of the car. The car is designed on the Chevrolet Cobalt platform. There is an independent suspension at the front, and a semi-independent spring suspension at the rear, with hydraulics. There is power steering.
  • On adaptation to Russia. There is something good in the technical characteristics of the Ravon R4. Even though the adaptation isn't perfect, it's still good. Fuel consumption is quite modest - 6l/100km. Consumes 91 gasoline. The rear window is electrically heated by default. The front seats and side windows are also heated. Ground clearance – 16 meters.
  • Comfort. Technical characteristics of Ravon R4 cannot do without a few words about comfort. The upholstery in the cabin is fabric, but of excellent quality. But we saved a lot on plastic. He's tough. The position of the control devices on the panel was taken from Cobalt. The driver's seat is slightly higher than necessary. The chair is adjustable, but somehow incomplete. Tall people It will be very uncomfortable in this car. The air conditioning is as simple as possible, there is no climate control at all. By the way, if we talk about convenience for rear row passengers, they will be quite comfortable.
  • Safety. We have almost finished talking about the technical characteristics of the Ravon R4, but have not touched upon the issue of safety. It is worth noting that besides ABS, child car seat mounts and an anti-lock door system, there is essentially nothing here.
  • Multimedia. All cars are equipped with a multimedia system. Standard system and small display. In general, the screen could have been bigger, but the sound does not disappoint at all.
  • Technical characteristics of Ravon R4 – engine. And let’s finish talking about the technical characteristics of the Ravon R4. The default is a 4-speed gearbox and a 1.4-liter engine. Equipped with a timing chain. It outputs 106 Horse power. In general, it is combined with a 5-speed gearbox or a 6-speed automatic transmission.

Kia Rio or Ravon: consider Kia Rio!

  • There are a total of four petrol engines and a pair of diesel engines to choose from. At the lower end of the range is the 1.25-litre petrol with 83bhp, an engine that should perform well outside the city. Next comes the 1.4-liter engine with a more generous 98 hp, this is the only engine that is available with automatic transmission transmission It has 4 gears, but it's dated. We'd be tempted to spend a little more for the 1.0-liter turbocharged three-cylinder engine, which produces 99 horsepower. With. This engine is overall good and provides even higher speed. A 118 hp version of this engine is also available, but you won't notice the extra power unless you work very hard. Honestly, it's not worth the extra money. Finally, there are a pair of 1.4-liter diesel engines with 76 PS or 89 PS.
  • When designing the Rio, Kia may have listened to the old car's lack of comfort, but making the seats softer didn't completely solve the problem. At low speeds, you feel the roughness of city roads, and if you hit a pothole, your seat can take a hit. However, at speed everything goes more smoothly.
  • The Rio's stiff suspension can make the ride comfortable. Steering also responsive. However, this responsiveness can be detrimental at low speeds.
  • The three-cylinder turbocharged engine is the best of its kind. It creates little vibration, even at idle, and these engines are quiet unless used to 100% of their potential. At motorway speeds the turbo engines are quiet, regardless of whether you have the five- or six-speed 1.0-litre version. Diesels are less impressive, sound rough at all times and send noticeable vibrations through the controls. In all models, there is a fair bit of road noise at speed and wind noise. However, superminis are generally not the quietest of cars at speed.
  • The driver's seat has many adjustments, both forward and backward, up and down. The steering wheel is also adjustable. Adjustable lumbar support is not available, but this is not uncommon in this type of body. The gear lever fits well in the hand - the lights, ventilation systems and information system are all easy to operate on the go.
  • The windshield gives quite good review. You also get good view from the side windows due to the window line remaining fairly flat. The rear view is less impressive - the rear window is rounded on the sides, which combined with the thick C-pillars makes reversing difficult. However, the situation is mitigated by the fact that there is a rear view camera.
  • Basic models receive bluetooth connection and a small 4-inch display, which may be difficult to read on the go. There is compatibility with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. However, it is worth noting that this system is only available in a fully equipped car.
  • Like many competitors, low price means you won't find soft plastics or premium trims. The interior parts are made of plastic and are not comfortable to touch. While there's nothing wrong with that, the door trims looked a little cheap with their scratchy, shiny finish.
  • The Rio's trunk is one of the largest in its class. It is characterized by a uniform shape and comes with a variety of hooks and fasteners. However, sometimes, when your hands are full, it can be inconvenient to open the trunk.
  • You get a lot of equipment, even on the most inexpensive trims. There's air conditioning, front power windows, heated power door mirrors, Bluetooth, automatic lights and a multifunction steering wheel. In the more expensive configuration, the steering wheel and gearbox are covered in leather, electric rear mirrors, parking sensors and a good subwoofer, plus emergency braking. The most expensive equipment offers an improved multimedia system, with connection to a smartphone, and leatherette seats.
  • All models receive traction and stability control, hill-start assistant and six airbags. You also get rear parking sensors and a rearview camera on mid-range trims and above to avoid accidents when reversing.
Rio's security is not so convincing. Let's move on to resolving the issue, Kia Rio or Ravon. The Kia Rio or Ravon P4 section is not so informative, but no less important.

So is it Kia Rio or Ravon R4?

Finally we come to the climax. Kia Rio or Ravon R4? Unlike Ravon, Kia Rio has a more advanced multimedia system. But when choosing a Kia Rio or Ravon R4, you can’t rely on this alone. Ravon loses in the matter of driver convenience. However, there are several nuances in favor of Ravon that may help him win in the matter of Kia Rio or Ravon. As an example, it can be noted that the build quality of the Ravon is still better, in addition, the Ravon P4 is much more spacious. Everyone decides for themselves what is more profitable: Kia Rio or Ravon R 4, and we, in turn, are always happy to offer you a new Ravon at the best price!

Not long ago on Russian market The new car company Ravon entered and rightfully occupied one of its most budget segments. Uzbek manufacturers focus on the simplicity and accessibility of their brand, without compromising on quality and reliability.

Models such as and have become some of the most popular among our car enthusiasts.

Exterior and dimensions

It should be noted that the Ravon R4 has a similar design to the Chevrolet Cobalt, once beloved by Russians: this model was a great success on the market, but, unfortunately, left it, thereby freeing up a profitable niche for the young brand. As an example to follow when developing Ravon Nexia R3 designers chose Chevrolet Aveo first generation. The exterior of the new models, of course, differs from the originals, but only slightly; for example, the radiator grille of the R4 has changed, but the rest of the elements have not undergone significant changes. The dimensions of the Nexia R3 are slightly smaller: width - 1690 mm, length - 4330 mm, height - 1505 mm, while the R4 has the following dimensions: width - 1735 mm, length - 4479 mm, height - 1514 mm. The advantage of the R4 can be safely called the extended wheelbase of 2620 mm, versus 2480 mm of the Nexia, this adds stability and makes the interior more spacious. The ground clearance of both models is quite high and amounts to 170 mm, which is an undeniable advantage on our not always ideal roads.

Salon

The interior decoration of both models is not much different. The interior of the Uzbek sedan looks attractive and laconic. The dashboard is made in classic style and quite informative. The center console trim material is durable plastic, and the design is quite ergonomic. The interior is decorated with high-quality fabric materials in soft, discreet tones. It should be noted that the car’s interior is more spacious, but it also does not seem cramped. Comfortable and practical seats have a significant range of adjustments, which will allow both the driver and passengers to sit in even greater comfort.

The luggage compartment is of no small importance in a car of any class. The leader among Ravon cars is the R4, which has a trunk volume of 563 liters, which is a significant advantage compared to the 400 liter trunk. In both models, the luggage compartment can be opened, as usual, with the key or from inside the cabin using a button.

Specifications

Under the hood, the developers for both the R4 and the R4 installed a Powertrain S-Tec III engine. The reliable 1.5 liter gasoline unit is equipped with four cylinders that are arranged vertically, a block made of cast iron, an aluminum cylinder head with a pair of camshafts, and the system is also equipped with a 16-valve gas distribution mechanism with a chain drive. The power of this engine is 106 hp when reaching 5800 rpm. The transmission depends on the configuration; the car can be equipped with the usual five-speed manual transmission (manual transmission) or a six-speed automatic transmission (automatic transmission). The suspension of these models is quite reliable, despite the budget price tag. The front struts are made by the well-established McPherson company. As for the front brakes, they are disc, but the rear brakes are drum type. The total weight of the car depends on the installed equipment and the type of gearbox - 1082 kg -1106 kg, while the larger model weighs 1140 kg -1170 kg. The fuel consumption of Nexia R3 in the urban cycle is on average 8 liters, while the consumption of R4 is not much more - 8.5 liters.

Comparison of basic configurations

To begin with, I would like to note that the basic configurations of both brands have quite decent equipment, which many motorists will find quite sufficient. In the configuration for the R4 and Nexia, the manufacturer promises the following options to ensure safety: of course, the first and main “safe” option is an airbag, but in this configuration there is only one - for the driver. ABS (automatic wheel locking). Stability control system - ESC. Reliable fixation of child seats is ensured by the patented ISOFix system; Ravon keeps pace with global safety requirements, so the Era-Glonass system is already included in the basic configuration. A pleasant safety bonus will be for owners of any of the brands in question fog lights. Comfort for any trip is given by a set of options that has already become familiar, such as power steering (also known as power steering), adjustable steering column height, heated rear window (with frequent frosts in our latitudes, very useful feature), by the way, seat heating is still not available in the basic configuration. Computer techologies have also firmly entered the field of mechanical engineering: on-board computer system, audio system, ports for connecting AUX and USB devices, tire pressure sensor - these options will surprise few people, but their presence certainly pleases.

As we can see, for a budget package, in general, it’s not even very bad, but still, for greater comfort, I would like to add electric windows at least for the driver and front passenger doors and, of course, air conditioning, which is also not provided in this package .

The only difference between the presented models is the price. For the basic configuration of the Ravon Nexia R3 model you will have to pay approximately 450,000 rubles, while the Ravon R4 will cost 490,000 rubles.

This difference, it must be said, does not look impressive, since, other things being equal, the Ravon R4 is larger in size and has a more spacious interior. Therefore, the choice, as always, remains yours.

Test drive Ravon Nexia R3

Test drive Ravon R4

Formally, the Ravon company has not done anything reprehensible: everyone has the right to rewrite prices for their products. In any size and at any time - so you and I shouldn’t complain. And yet, the marketing move of the young Uzbek brand did not turn out to be very beautiful, although - if we discard the moral aspect - it borders on genius. By the way, I don’t remember a similar act on the part of any other manufacturer. So what actually happened?

Having launched the Ravon Nexia (aka the previous generation Chevrolet Aveo) and the Ravon R2 (Chevrolet Spark), the Uzbeks put extremely attractive price tags on both models. The price for Nexia started at 419,000 rubles and automatically made it the most affordable sedan after the Lada Granta. You could become the owner of the R2, which comes to us exclusively with an automatic rifle, for only 409,000 rubles. Of course, the media immediately informed everyone that Ravon was making one hell of an offer to buyers. And then - suddenly!..

When the printed automotive press and major Internet portals tested the new products from Asaka and praised the combination of price and quality, the cost of Ravon products went up. The basic versions of Nexia and R2 increased in price by 60,000 rubles at once - and this is a very impressive 15%! And although the Nexia is still a good option for a budget sedan, and the baby R2 is the most affordable car with two pedals, you no longer want to turn a blind eye to its imperfections. Today we are talking about Nexia, which showed itself well during our recent.

Let me make a reservation right away - the test Ravon Nexia R3 in the maximum Elegant configuration with a 6-speed automatic transmission has risen in price less than other versions (+10,000 rubles) and now costs 579,000 rubles. But after the company so easily and cheerfully left the entire press in the cold, I look at this car with slightly different eyes. And the first thing that bothers them is the build quality.

To be honest, it’s impossible to say that the test Nexia is poorly assembled. Compared to the Ravon Gentra sedan, which we tested a year ago, everything is fine with the Nexia. The doors close the first time, and all four close with the same force. The smell of phenol in the cabin is not as distinct as before. And yet, even a picky person will notice the uneven gaps between the black glossy area and its chrome trim at the base of the automatic transmission selector, the skewed plastic panel under the windshield and the shaking plastic lining of the driver's threshold. Despite the fact that such defects are not found on every specimen, they speak volumes about the instability of quality.

In all other respects, the interior of the new Nexia makes an excellent impression. The seating geometry is good, the front seats are comfortable. From an ergonomic point of view, the Ravon R3 is completely preferable to both Granta and Logan - their competitors in the above-mentioned test. Perhaps the only thing that shows the age of the car (the Chevrolet Aveo T250 debuted in 2006) is the small pockets in the front doors, not designed for even a half-liter bottle of water. But everything else is in perfect order. It’s all the more offensive that with such a pleasant picture, the issue of quality may attract attention.

By the way, I would like to take this opportunity to make a correction. After the publication of the material, we received a letter from reader Ilya, which said that the two-tone interior with light armchairs was not Ravon’s find, as I wrote in the material. Indeed, similar interiors were available to buyers of the Chevrolet Aveo T250. But Russian dealers never had cars with such interiors, and it was this fact that was misleading. Excuse me!

The driving advantages of Nexia over its main competitors - no matter how pretentious it may sound - are obvious. This is a good one and a half liter engine and a modern six-speed automatic transmission from the Chevrolet Cobalt (more recently - Ravon R4). However, such a box is installed not only on Cobalt, but also on a number of GM models. So, the combination of engine and gearbox gives the sedan absolutely adequate acceleration dynamics and keeps fuel appetite within a reasonable range. Even in the city, Nexia’s consumption is within 10 l/100 km, while Renault Logan With a 1.6-liter engine and an antique four-speed automatic, the DP2 can burn up to 14-15 liters per hundred.

What's frustrating on the go? An overly stiff suspension, unable to adequately deal with even subtle coating defects, and frankly poor sound insulation. Moreover, the “Shumka” again forces us to raise the issue of quality: in addition to the weak protection of the wheel arches and engine compartment, at speeds over 80 km/h the wind begins to blow through the driver’s door seal with a nasty whistle. I really hope that quality control in Asaka will be taken under control. And the next Ravon, which we will take for testing in a year, in terms of accuracy of assembly will differ from the test Nexia for the better, just as strikingly as it itself differs from last year’s Gentra.

To summarize, the Ravon Nexia R3, even after the price increase, continues to remain one of the most attractive offers in the class. But since the Uzbeks decided to immediately raise prices for their cars by 15% (if we talk about the initial versions), then the demand for them will be different. And if we talk about top-end versions, how about, following the price increase, we finally equip the Nexia with heated front seats and remote control central lock? The introduction of these penny options on a production scale could easily justify a price increase. And their absence, on the contrary, can and will certainly scare off some potential buyers. In general, we are looking forward to changes for the better in the new year! And we really hope that they will do without another rewrite of the price tag.

Any car that comes off the assembly line needs to prove its attractiveness to the buyer. One important factor is price. If good technical qualities, confident dynamics, modern design body and interior, then the popularity of such a model is guaranteed. For many car enthusiasts who want to purchase a new iron horse, the question of choice is acute - Lada Vesta or Ravon R4.

Both cars belong to the budget category city ​​sedans. They are distinguished by their cost, technical equipment, body dimensions and the range of available options. Taking this into account, every future vehicle owner will have to make a choice in favor of the domestic or Uzbek automobile industry.

Lada Vesta or Ravon R4: a few words about the manufacturers

« Lada"is a VAZ product with very worthy characteristics regarding both the design idea and the technical part. The plant engineers managed to achieve good dynamics of the car due to the balanced operation of the engine and gearbox. The exterior of Vesta has noticeably evolved in comparison with Soviet-style models.

Ravon R4– a car assembled on the basis of “UZAutoMotors”. Previously, the enterprise, which inherited the traditions of Daewoo, was part of the famous General Motors corporation. But now it has become completely state-owned. This says a lot. The quality of cars of the new Uzbek brand is explained by the use of the design and technical platform of JIM.

In particular, the P4 sedan is an analogue of the Chevrolet Cobalt, which was successfully sold in Russia in 2012. The quality and location of assembly have not changed, only the model name has changed.

Ravon P4 or Lada Vesta: prices and configurations

For absolutely all trim levels of the Ravon R4, only one engine option is available. Complete with a 6-speed automatic transmission there is a one and a half liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve in-line engine with a capacity of 106 horsepower.

It is worth noting that the chain-driven engine model used by the Uzbek manufacturer, although it does not claim to be an ultra-modern model, pleases with performance characteristics that have been tested in practice.

The basic version of Comfort costs 678 thousand rubles and includes:

  • front airbags for front row;
  • child seat mount;
  • ABS brake system;
  • an audio system with a set of ports for connecting external devices;
  • central locking;
  • power steering;
  • adjustable chairs;
  • heating of the interior and rear-view mirrors;
  • height adjustment of the steering column;
  • immobilizer;
  • and etc.

Air conditioning is only available in the following sedan versions. This option is closed when equipped with a manual transmission.

  • find out

The Optimum version expands the functionality of the cabin. To everything available in the basic kit, electric windows for the front row, heated seats for the driver and passenger, as well as other options are added that increase the comfort of staying in the cabin.

Those who prefer maximum comfort can choose the top-end Elegant version. The difference compared to Optimum AT is only 13 thousand rubles. The surcharge will manifest itself on the upholstery of the seats and the format of the trim of the console and the inside of the doors. The sedan is equipped with cast aluminum wheels.

Who will be better in comparing the prices of the Lada Vesta or Ravon P4 trim levels? Let's look at what Lada Vesta offers.

Lada Vesta configurations

Lada Vesta costs 528 thousand rubles from the start. Basic equipment The classic is equipped with brake force distribution systems, an anti-lock braking system ABS and the BAS function, traction control and exchange rate control, a hill start assistant, an on-board computer, and power steering.

Interior options:

  • child seat fastenings;
  • two airbags;
  • adjustment of the steering column for reach and height;
  • central locking function remote control;
  • power windows for the first row;
  • heated front seats and side mirrors.

Air conditioning is not provided as for the P4 Comfort model. You can purchase it in the “Start” package.

The next level of equipment adds an audio system to the Lada's interior, sun visors for the front row, a parking sensor, a height-adjustable driver's seat, door handles and side mirrors that are the same color as the body.

For the Comfort package, you can purchase the Image upgrade package. It includes: heated windshield and aluminum wheels. The addition of the Multimedia package will allow you to expand the potential of the media system.

Vesta has much more variety of configurations. In addition, if you want to improve the equipment of your car, you can rely not only on increasing the optional features of the interior, but also on strengthening the technical base.

Under the hood of Vesta there may be a 106-horsepower 1.6-liter gasoline unit. or a 122-horsepower 1.8-liter engine. The latter is paired exclusively with an automatic transmission, while in tandem with the first engine a manual or 5-speed automatic transmission can operate.

Ravon or Vesta: interior comparison

Getting into the P4 salon you immediately notice that The build quality of the Uzbek manufacturer is much better than those of popular Chinese state employees. Even if gaps reveal themselves upon close inspection, they do not hurt the eye with their curvature or deliberate undulation.

Front panel of Ravon P4

The interior trim is made of hard plastic, which does not make creaking sounds while driving and does not emit an unpleasant odor. At first glance, everything is quite decent and neat.


photo: auto.tut.by

When you sit in the driver's seat, you feel a high seating position. Unfortunately, you can only adjust the position of the back of the chair, but not the seat. Even the steering column is adjustable only in height. What can I say, you will have to adapt to the driver’s seat; you won’t be able to model it for yourself right away.

Ergonomic placement of control functions and excellent visibility of the road provide a comfortable driving experience.

The only detail that spoils the overall picture is the shortened format of the door handles. This design feature applies to both front and rear doors.

Back row of Ravon R4

The rear passenger row of the Ravon P4 is quite spacious and well-organized. There is nothing superfluous in its arrangement. The most important thing is that the gaps between the sofa and the row of front seats are quite wide.


photo: auto.tut.by

A passenger with a height of 180 cm can comfortably fit in the rear part of the cabin. The seated person will not rest his head on the ceiling or press his knees into the lower back of the driver or passenger. Thanks to the high seating position, you can even slide your feet under the front seats.

The thoughtful design of the rear seat, low threshold and door opening angle allow you to get in and out of the car without any problems.

The manufacturer has not equipped the rear part of the cabin with lighting and armrests, but there is a cup holder, headrests and two spacious pockets on the back of the front seats. Oddly enough, many car brands ignore equipping budget cars with this simple but useful design decision.

Salon Lada Vesta

Lada Vesta is slightly different in interior design format. Doorway slightly wider, and the door handle is oriented to the habitual grip of an adult. The driver's seat is height adjustable. A profile of medium rigidity with characteristic protrusions that prevent the body from tilting when turning the car.


photo: auto.tut.by

The steering wheel can be adjusted in two planes - height and reach, which makes it easy to customize the driver's seat. The material for finishing the budget employee is practical plastic. You can upgrade it with additional “metal-like” inserts by purchasing configurations at an additional cost.

The space in the rear passenger row is noticeably smaller than that of the P4, which is surprising given the difference in the dimensions of the cabins. The product of the domestic automobile industry has a cabin width of 149.5 cm, while the Uzbek public sector model has only 142 cm.


photo: auto.tut.by

At the same time, the space between the rows in Vesta is a couple of centimeters less, and the ceiling is lower.

It will be uncomfortable for a tall person to stay here. Even the presence of wide rear pockets, height-adjustable headrests and ceiling handles above the door openings do not brighten up this drawback. Armrests and lighting in the rear are also missing.

Car trunks

The Ravon’s trunk has an impressive volume of 563 liters. If necessary, it can be increased by folding the rear passenger sofa. The luggage compartment is unlocked by pressing a button on the key, but there is nothing resembling a handle on the lid itself. To close, you will have to grasp the outer stamping and apply light pressure.


photo: auto.tut.by

Vesta's trunk unlocks with three different ways- with a button on the key, a key on the control panel in the cabin, or directly with the key, as in old Soviet cars.


photo: auto.tut.by

The trunk lid is equipped with two convenient handles located inside and outside. The luggage compartment volume is inferior in size to the Uzbek sedan. It is only 480 liters. To increase the size, you will need to assemble the back row of seats.

Ravon R4 or Lada Vesta video

How state employees drive, how experts evaluate the driving performance of Lada Vesta and Ravon R4 cars - watch the video.

Which of the public sector cars to choose - Lada Vesta or Ravon R4 - everyone decides for themselves. In defense of both, it can be said that from a practical point of view, they are completely worth the amount of money invested in the purchase. There are no problems with maintenance.

In our market, the budget car Ravon replaced the popular Daewoo, and the Chevrolet Aveo T250 was replaced by new model Ravon Nexia RZ. The automobile plant has been creating reliable and inexpensive cars for many years. Affordable price combined with good equipment, both for the stated price, aroused considerable interest among potential consumers. In a short time the car gained great popularity.

The advantages of the machine are obvious. We were told about them in detail during the presentation. And what disadvantages of Ravon Nexia are noted by the owners, taking into account operating experience.

About the car Ravon Nexia R3

The newly built car was presented to the general public in Moscow in 2015. Uzbek representatives noted that the main priorities that the company sets for itself are not risky experiments.

Reliability and time-tested quality are put in first place. At the same time, manufacturers rely on innovative technologies and a high level of comfort. To confirm his words, the manufacturer presented a model at a budget price with a good level of equipment, as for this class of car, which, of course, could not help but attract consumers.

Rewinding time, it is worth noting that the big surprise was that Ravon Nexia P3 does not at all look like the traditional Nexia. Another debutant is a modified version of the Aveo T250. In the appearance of the car, features of the Aveo hatchback and sedan can be traced. The result attracted attention and aroused interest. The new model has an original and attractive appearance.

The word "ravon" means a smooth, even path. Manufacturers noted that the new model has every chance to live up to its name. It successfully combines many advantages, including high safety, excellent technical equipment, driving performance, stylish appearance and comfort. The car is positioned by the manufacturer as the choice of modern, rational and pragmatic people.

The manufacturer offers the machine in several variations:

  • Comfort;
  • Optimum;
  • Elegant.

The buyer can also choose automatic or manual transmission. Safety is excellent for a car of this class. Depending on the configuration, the number of options may vary.

The manufacturer offers a wide palette of colors and several options for interior equipment. Everything is presented simply gorgeous. The budget car is well equipped and seems to be well worth its price. However, like any product, it must have not only strengths, but also weaknesses.
Let's look at the disadvantages of Ravon Nexia P3 based on reviews from real owners after some time of operation.

Disadvantages of Ravon Nexia R3

What disadvantages do users note based on their operating experience?

Salon

The interior of the car is offered in several variations. It can be monochromatic or made in a combination of several colors. Since this brand belongs to budget car models, the possibility of finishing with real leather or expensive wood is not provided.

For some users this is not important, others note it as a drawback.
It is worth noting that the plastic in the cabin and the fabric for the covers look quite decent for a budget car. In the maximum version, the doors are trimmed with fabric covering. The plastic is of good quality, pleasant to the touch and silent. The interior has quite decent seats with height adjustment.

Disadvantages include the lack of heated front seats. For comfortable accommodation there is enough space for four well-fed adults or five students.

Build quality

The build quality cannot be called bad, but many users still note some shortcomings. It is worth noting that the salon, as before, strongly reeks of a hairdryer.
Even a not very picky consumer will notice uneven voids between the glossy black platform and the chrome rim at the base of the automatic transmission selector. Some users point to a warped plastic panel under the windshield.

The plastic lining of the driver's threshold is also installed crookedly and shakes.

It is worth noting that such disadvantages are not found on every model. Based on the facts described above, we can conclude that the build quality is unstable. In all other respects, the interior is not bad for a budget car - excellent geometry, excellent fit, comfortable seats.

Inside the car looks modern. The only thing that shows its age is the small pockets in the front doors, where you can’t even put a plastic bottle.

Interior equipment, multimedia, sound, speakers

The radio is very simple, which is what you would expect from a car of this class. The radio is not bad. The speakers are weak, but the sound is not annoying. Many people don't like the multifunction steering wheel. The reason is the inconvenient multifunction keys.

The stove heats, the air conditioner cools, the rotator for air flow distribution works well. Everything is thought out, simple and noble.

Driving characteristics

The car drives well. The engine is quite playful, the reliability of a budget car is excellent. Users note the high intelligence of the machine. The driving characteristics are good for a car of this class.

They are much better than other competitors. The car has a good engine and a modern gearbox. A good connection between the engine and gearbox gives the vehicle adequate acceleration dynamics and keeps fuel consumption within reasonable limits.
The suspension is dense and durable. The ground clearance is perfect for our roads.

Disadvantages noted by users:

  • A serious drawback is the lack of an anti-gravel film that protects the rear wheel arches from stones and sand.
  • Users note poor quality of sound insulation. It's much worse than Logan and Granta's.
  • Some users considered the lack of side airbags, even in the top version, to be a serious drawback.
  • On smooth asphalt the car feels great. But at joints, holes and potholes it is not very comfortable to be inside. The suspension is hard.

A significant disadvantage is the lack of remote control for central locking, as well as heated front seats. This can greatly discourage potential consumers.

What frustrates you while driving?

Too hard suspension, weak noise. It is worth noting that Shumka forces us to raise the issue of quality. In addition to poor protection of the wheel arches and engine compartment, users note that at high speed wind breaks through the driver's door seal.

In general, the car is most likely not for everybody. And a good foreign car for the price Grants are just an illusion of prosperity, nothing more. The car is cheap, looks neat, drives well, and is quite comfortable to be inside. However, even after the price increase in its class, the car remains one of the most attractive options.